General Data
Name of instrument Counter for Consolidated Procedure ('Sportello Unico per le Attività Produttive')
Country IT
Spatial level local
Type Economic instruments
Subtype Subsidies and local business development
Description It consists of a department operating at municipal (or inter-municipal) level, which, according to National Law DLgs112/98 (and related laws), deals with all administrative requirements and information concerning productive/business structures to be newly constructed, enlarged, converted, re-opened or dismissed (including restoration works to be carried out inside the enterprise's premises). A Stakeholder Commission (see entry) can be summoned by the head of the department when: a) Any due consents are lacking after 90-day delay; b) The submitted project implies modification of the existing urban planning tools; c) The entrepreneur wants to ascertain whether the possibility exists of overcoming any explicit refusal to consent. It is composed of the stakeholders (public and private, including citizens groups) affected by the productive structure to be realized.
General objectives Simplify and speed up the traditional administrative procedures for entrepreneurs. Contribute to economic development (esp. SMEs located in disadvantaged and marginal areas).
General objectives keywords simplified administration; SMEs; socio-economic development;
Responsible Local authority/Municipal council
Stakeholder Involved Planners; Entrepreneurs/businessmen; Citizen groups;
Reference Laws (National: DLgs112/98, DPR 447/98 and 440/2000; Regional - federal: several). http://suap.dimmidove.com/carta.htm
General assessment of strength and weakness Strength: Speed up requirements to implement productive/business activities. Concerning the Stakeholder Commission system: Enhance transparency, cooperation and build mutual trust.
Weakness: Exposed to strong entrepreneur pressures: the Stakeholder Commission system does not apply in all cases, nor is the participation of non-public stakeholders mandatory.
Metadata
Date of entry 2007/05/01
Implementation
Legal status mandatory
Extension frequent (<50% and >25%)
Comment
Type of monitoring Report basing on quantitative indicators
Characteristics
Preconditions for implementation
General comment
Assessment
Relevance
Status -
Ranking 0
Remark general instrument, relevance for land ressource management depends on the decision to be taken
Acceptance
Status at least accepted by local economy and propably by municipal administration
Ranking 2
Remark acceptance maybe higher
Implementation
Status -
Ranking 3
Remark -
Feasibility
Status Budget, staff, legislation, political will
Ranking 2
Remark -
Effectiveness
Status Acceptability
Ranking 1
Remark -